Purpose: The medical assistant (MA) in the genitourinary (GU) clinic at a Magnet, NCI-designated comprehensive cancer center has the ability to work effectively in a team environment but can also work as a self-motivated, highly functioning individual while in the cystoscopy procedure room. These two areas of practice make the MA role in the GU clinic both dynamic and multifaceted.
In 2017, the medical assistant team began experiencing high turnover. This made it challenging for the remaining medical assistant team members to work cohesively and safely. Our aim was to elevate the role of the MA to “top of license” in order to improve job satisfaction and retention.
Description: The nurses in the GU clinic developed a MA preceptor/RN mentor program. Each newly hired MA is paired with a MA preceptor. The MA preceptor completed a GU-provided preceptor class, which included developing skills in authentic dialogue and being comfortable with discussing feedback techniques effectively. The new MA is also paired with a RN who is an accredited preceptor. This RN acts as a mentor to the new hire and as a mentor to the MA preceptor. The RN meets with each MA separately and then together as a team to foster communication, identifies goals, and provides a solid support system throughout the orientation process.
Outcome: Our MA team has developed into a strong, competent team who has become empowered to further improve their processes. Each new MA hire that was paired with an MA preceptor has remained with the team, thus reducing the high turnover rate. When the process was implemented in September 2017, the team was down to 2 MAs. Now, in November 2019, our team has grown to 9 MAs. The MAs reported feeling more confident in their role. MA retention rate increased from 36% to 73% post-RN mentor implementation. The clinic staff reports confidence in the MA skill level.
Evaluation: The development of a MA preceptor with RN mentor orientation process for new MA staff was successful. MAs who are paired with a trained MA preceptor and a trained RN mentor report feeling more empowered in their role and demonstrate that empowerment daily through their work. They have successfully started their own initiatives to improve existing processes. The MA team makes daily assignments and adjusts it according to the clinic’s daily needs. The empowerment within this MA team has a positive impact on patients, the clinic staff, and on future hires as well.
Purpose (what): The goal of this project was to empower nursing and other clinic staff to come up with a solution to reduce overall patient wait time and improve clinic patient satisfaction.
Relevance/significance (why): In fiscal year 2018, the clinic ranked in the 20th percentile for wait time according to Press Ganey results. This metric combined with real-time patient feedback in clinic suggested wait time needed to be an area for focused improvement.
Strategy/implementation/methods (how): In an effort to decrease patient waiting time and improve patient satisfaction, a multidisciplinary team of nurses, dental assistants, surgeons, and administrators came together to identify barriers and form solutions. The team identified clinic templates as the root cause of the problem. The nurses vocalized that the template was built not taking patient diagnosis and complexity into consideration. The team designed a new template to strategically space out clinic appointments based on appointment type and diagnosis.
Evaluation/outcomes/results (so what): Total patient wait time was decreased an average of 20 minutes over the course of 6 months. The template redesign created clinic flow efficiencies, yielding shorter wait times for patients. Press Ganey feedback also demonstrated improvement as the percentile ranking went from the 20th percentile to 65th percentile. This increase suggested the template redesign positively impacted patient satisfaction by decreasing wait time at the clinic.
Conclusions/implications (and now): This project is an example of the power of shared governance. By including each member of the team, we received valuable insight that led to not only improved delivery of patient care, but also a more engaged team as a whole.
Background and purpose: As we try to reign in the rising cost of health care, the fee for service model has come under great scrutiny. This payment structure has resulted in the US spending more per person on health care than any other country. The value-based payment structure, where payment is based on a set of performance measures, was introduced as a structure to reduce spending while maintaining or improving the quality of health care. A large accountable care organization in the Southwest created a central team of administrative medical assistants who focus on gathering data from disparate systems within and outside of the organization and/or contacting patients directly to satisfy quality measures.
Methods: Under nursing leadership a central population health team was created. This team consists of administrative medical assistants led by managers who are also medical assistants. Originally these medical assistants were housed in the clinic and often found themselves being pulled to perform direct patient care. In 2018, the administrative medical assistants were removed from the clinic setting and centralized allowing the organization to leverage economies of scale and to solely focus on improving quality measures.
Results: This centralized concept showed a positive impact on colorectal cancer screening, breast cancer screening, HbA1c control for diabetics, and hypertension blood pressure control quality measures. From the end of 2017 to September 2019 colorectal cancer screening increased 3.4%, breast cancer screening increased 4.6%, HbA1c control for diabetics decreased 1.8% (inverse measure) and hypertension blood pressure control increased 6.3%.
Conclusion: The value of having a centralized administrative medical assistant model is reflected in the improvement in these four quality measures. All four measures are meeting or exceeding the CMS 4 STAR rating.
Standardizing guidelines could save money, reduce risk and harm, and provide simpler means to measure outcomes. It takes effort for providers to agree on a standard. Literature review, collaboration, and persistent nurses informed Providence women's clinics to agree on one test despite no conclusive recommendation on which gestational diabetes screening method is best (Caughey, A. & Turrentine M., 2108). Though it took 8 years, clinicians worked hard to agree on a measure that would save time and money.
Reference
1. Caughey, A., & Turrentine, M. Acog practice bulletin: Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 131(2).